Improving Ticket Purchase Flow: Shedd Aquarium
Eye Tracking
Usability Testing
OVERVIEW

Smarter Steps to Seamless Booking

Product description:
Shedd Aquarium supports a world rich in aquatic life, sustained by those who understand, love, and protect it. Through global partnerships and collaborative efforts, the aquarium promotes curiosity, compassion, and conservation for aquatic animals across the planet.
Goal: To enhance overall usability and customer experience during ticket purchases through the programs and events pathway.

Tools:
Figma, Tobii Pro Lab
SKIP TO THE GOOD PART
PROBLEM

Gaps in the Ticket-Purchase Flow

Identify checkout issues and delays on "Programs & Events" pages.
Assess how device use, user intent, and pricing clarity affect usability and decisions.
Improve the mobile experience by seeing how device type affects the ticket-buying journey.

What role did I play?

I worked with a team of UX designers and researchers to improve the Shedd Aquarium’s ticket and events flow.I planned and ran eye-tracking tests to uncover usability issues, analyzed user behavior, and identified key pain points.I shared insights through mockups and a client presentation to support design decisions.
APPROACH

Our Strategy

Timeline
4 Weeks
Testing took place at the Pratt Institute Manhattan Campus.
Tests Conducted
13 Sessions
Participants were chosen based on age and prior experience making online purchases for cultural institutions.
Device
7:6 Desktop to Mobile
A focus was placed on the mobile version to cater to a majority of the Shedd Aquarium's user demographic.
Method
Eye Tracking
A testing method that tracks eye movements to reveal user attention and navigation.
Tool
Tobii Lab Pro
Software that collects and analyzes eye-tracking data to assess user behavior on digital interfaces.
Supplementary Methods
Questionnaire
A post-test method for gathering user insights and qualitative feedback on interface experience and satisfaction.
ISSUE TO SOLUTION

Program and Event Labeling Ambiguity

Issue: Confusing terms make navigation hard

Users are confused by the terminology distinguishing "Programs," "Events," and "Experiences," which makes it difficult to navigate and select appropriate offerings. The key difference in these offerings can influence how effectively users discern between options.

Recommendation: Updated text and labels highlight offerings

The hero body copy was updated to better highlight the offerings included in Programs. Standout pills were added to the Program/Event titles to draw attention to additional financial incentives.
ISSUE TO SOLUTION

Ineffective Pricing Communication

Issue: Cart Progress Bar Lacks Clarity

The current cart progress bar does not effectively indicate the user's stage in the checkout process or provide visibility into the cost of each selected add-on.

Recommendation: Clear Checkout Steps & Cost Breakdown

By clarifying the user's current stage in the checkout process, confusion around navigation and timing is reduced. Reformatting the cart progress sidebar also helps users better understand how each selection contributes to the total cost of the experience.

What Did We Achieve?

A standout price component
can help reduce cart abandonment.
Transparent booking process
builds trust and encourages repeat visits.
Adding Context to Pages
helps reduce user confusion and improves navigation.
Clearer Pricing
during checkout boosts satisfaction and lowers support requests.
TAKEAWAYS

The Think Tank(ed)

The Shedd Aquarium team warmly received our assessment of the usability issues in their ticket purchase process. Many of the challenges we identified aligned with concerns they were already aware of—particularly those frequently addressed by their call center staff. As an avid aquarium enthusiast, I truly enjoyed collaborating with the Shedd team and supporting their mission to provide Chicagoans with an engaging and educational experience.

My Experience with Eye Tracking:
Eye-tracking testing was a challenging but valuable experience. Coordinating participants and using Tobii Lab Pro for the first time presented a learning curve, but it provided meaningful data to support our usability recommendations. The process helped me understand how users’ gaze patterns—particularly the time spent on specific components—can influence their sense of orientation on a website and clarify what actions they need to take.

Ways I Can Improve:
Ultimately, I’d love to continue developing my eye-tracking skills and conduct further testing. As both a researcher and designer, I recognize the value of expanding my participant pool to include more diverse perspectives, as most of our participants were college-aged. I also see an opportunity to address usability concerns for non-English speakers—particularly Spanish-speaking users—to make the website more inclusive and accessible.